Federal court overrules ID checks on immigrant students

A three-judge panel of 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down a portion of Alabama’s strict immigration law that required public schools to check the legal status of students.

In a friend-of-the-court brief late last year, NSBA, the National Education Association, and the Alabama Education Association said the law was trying to use “fear and intimidation to drive undocumented immigrants from the state.”

The law had put public schools in a difficult position –on one hand, required by federal law to serve all children in the state regardless of their immigration status; on the other, being thrust to the front lines of a highly partisan battle over illegal immigration.

NSBA released a guide for educators last year, “Legal Issues for School Districts Related to the Education of Undocumented Children,” that discusses legal questions related to undocumented students that are commonly asked by school officials.

The main federal law is 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case Plyler v. Doe held that undocumented students have a constitutional right to attend public elementary and secondary school for free, although there are other conflicted lower court rulings and many issues that the Plyler decision did not address, according to the guide.

Nevertheless, “The law of the land still requires that schools provide an education for undocumented students,” said NSBA’s General Counsel Francisco M. Negrón, Jr.

Numerous states have debated the fates of undocumented students in recent years, and the issue has reemerged with the Obama administration’s recent announcement that they will defer the deportations of thousands of young adults who came to the United States as children.

Read a legal analysis of the decision in Legal Clips.








Lawrence Hardy|August 22nd, 2012|Categories: Board governance, Council of School Attorneys, Diversity, Immigrants, School Law|Tags: , , , , , , , , |


  1. Concerned CITIZEN says:

    Francisco M. Negron you have the audacity to mention the law of the land while on the other hand you clearly support rewarding individuals that come to this country illegally by supporting educating their children! And do you not realize that it is at the expense of the students that were born here and were raised speaking english???? I dare anyone to put forth the issues related to teaching in a classroom when there are language barriers due to illegal students with limited English! It is apalling in some states they will only hire teachers if they are BILINGUAL! American citizens are unemployable in their own country because they can’t speak the language of an illegal population that our society is becoming overwhelmed with. It is a fact that supporting children of illegals puts a great drain on public services INCLUDING the public school system! These public services were not put in place to be drained by those that aren’t citizens. I am exhausted by this type of sentiment! I do not and I will not support rewarding those that intentionally break our laws by providing free education, free meals, and free healthcare to the parents or their children! Not when we still have Americans CITIZENS out of work and homeless!

Leave a Reply