Many years ago, when I was a college senior in Southern California, I took a child development class connected with a wonderful campus preschool that was all the things you would expect a 70s-era preschool to be discovery oriented, child centered, creative, and fun. It guess you could call it “open classroom” as well, seeing as the kids had the run of a multi-room former home; of course it helped, in terms of classroom control, that in addition to having a wonderful director there was a ratio of roughly one college student helper for every two children.
Flip ahead two years, and I was one of the teachers in a Head Start program for minority students in Boston’s South End. This was also “open classroom,” but by necessity: There was some structural problem in one classroom that forced us to combined two classrooms of 20-some students each into a mega-class of four teachers and more than 40-something children.
Yes, it was bedlam. There were just too many students and too much noise for much real learning to occur.
I thought about those two schools this week after reading about an experimental elementary school in Brooklyn founded by a former principal and Harvard graduate student who was trying to replicate the small discussion groups at Phillips Exeter Academy. This is analogous to my California school. But, according to a New York Times story on the project and Joanne Jacobs’ subsequent blog, instead of organizing several small groups (which may not have been possible) the founder put 60 first graders in a class with four teachers, and the results were
. yes, as the Times strongly implies, bedlam. The same thing I experienced in Boston.
(more…)




